🧾 What courts often reject – even when you feel confident

❌ 1) Lack of evidence coherence

You have an invoice – but no proof of what triggered it. Or you have a contract – but no delivery confirmation.
Courts don’t rely on assumptions. You need to clearly show: why, what, how much, when, and to whom.

❌ 2) Messy contract documentation

You have multiple contract versions, amendments, and emails… but can’t explain which one applies.
That raises doubts about the agreement, and doubt works against you.

❌ 3) Contradictory evidence

Your contract says 14 days due, but the email mentions one month. Which one counts?
Conflicting evidence may lead to rejection of the claim.

❌ 4) No proof of delivery

You sent a pre-litigation notice, but have no mailing slip or electronic proof.
Without that, the court might rule that the debtor was never officially notified.

❌ 5) Emotional but legally weak content

Clients often attach emotional rants, friend testimonies, or vague texts – which don’t hold up as legal evidence.
Courts want concrete, relevant documents, not feelings of injustice.

📌 Real-life example

Ms. D. sued for CZK 120,000. She had a loan agreement and a bank transfer record.
But it turned out the money was sent to a third-party account – and there was no clear proof that the debtor actually received the funds.
Without a proper chain of evidence, the court dismissed her case.

🧷 Attorney’s tip

Having evidence is not enough – you must present it coherently.
Ask yourself in every case: “If I were the judge, would I believe this?”
That’s why I always recommend:

• Have your documents checked at least once by a lawyer

• Don’t rely on your intuition – trust legal logic and structure

• Ensure key documents include delivery confirmation, signatures, and clear connections